Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0806
D

Failure to Accommodate Resident Meal Preferences and Provide Alternatives

Claremont, New Hampshire Survey Completed on 08-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide meals that accommodated the individual preferences of two residents. One resident, who is on dialysis and requires extra protein, repeatedly did not receive the requested chocolate milk with meals as indicated on their meal ticket. Observations over multiple meals confirmed that chocolate milk was not provided, nor was any substitution offered. The Food Service Director later confirmed that chocolate milk was unavailable due to financial and vendor issues, and acknowledged that an alternative should have been offered. Another resident consistently received scrambled eggs for breakfast despite expressing a dislike for them to the Food Service Director. Observations showed that the resident refused to eat the eggs and was not offered an alternative meal. The resident's food preference assessment did not list scrambled eggs as a dislike, but the Food Service Director confirmed being informed of the resident's preference. Facility policy requires that alternative food be offered if a resident refuses a meal or desires something else, but this was not followed in these cases.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙