Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Update Care Plan for Resident's Discharge Preferences

Minneapolis, Minnesota Survey Completed on 09-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain an up-to-date comprehensive care plan for a resident who was reviewed for discharge planning. The resident, who had intact cognition but experienced hallucinations, delusions, and fluctuating disorganized thinking, was independent with all activities of daily living. Despite multiple documented expressions of the desire to move out of the facility and pursue alternative living arrangements, such as assisted living or independent living, the resident's care plan was not updated to reflect these preferences. The care plan continued to state that the resident wished to remain in the facility and only wanted to be asked about discharge plans annually, with the last revision not reflecting the resident's ongoing requests for discharge. Progress notes and interviews with staff confirmed that the resident repeatedly communicated her wish to leave the facility, and assessments for relocation services were initiated. However, the care plan did not document these changes in the resident's goals or preferences. Staff interviews further revealed a lack of awareness or clarity regarding the resident's discharge plans, and both the assistant director of nursing and the social worker acknowledged that the care plan should have been updated to reflect the resident's expressed wishes. The facility's own policy required care plans to be regularly reviewed and updated to reflect changes in condition or preferences, which was not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙