Facility Assessment Lacked Required Staffing Input and Planning
Summary
The facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment that included the required components for competent resident care during day-to-day operations and emergencies. The assessment dated 7/22/24 did not show active involvement from direct care staff, including RNs, LPNs, and NAs. Instead, the document listed involvement from the administrator, DON, Governing Body representative, medical director, pharmacist, and residents or resident representatives/family members through letters, family council, and resident council. The assessment also failed to consider staffing needs for each unit and each shift in the facility. Although the document stated acuity needs were reviewed through resident assessments, care plans, and census, and that staffing needs were determined by resident population, CMI, census, admissions, and discharges, it did not include a unit-by-unit or shift-by-shift staffing analysis. The assessment also lacked a plan to recruit and retain direct care staff and did not include contingency planning for events that did not require activation of the emergency plan but could affect resident care, such as availability of direct care nurse staffing or other resources. Facility records and interviews showed ongoing staffing concerns and delayed call light response times. Daily schedules from 7/15/25 through 8/14/25 showed nurses and TMAs on the north and south units and NAs assigned to specific room groups with a float aide, while call light records for four residents showed 115 waits over 20 minutes, 28 over 30 minutes, 50 over 40 minutes, 3 over 50 minutes, 4 over 60 minutes, 2 over 70 minutes, 2 over 80 minutes, 1 over 90 minutes, and 1 over 120 minutes. Residents, family members, NAs, and an RN reported long waits, incontinence while waiting for assistance, and staffing being cut due to empty beds, including one NA leaving early at 9:00 p.m. The SC stated staffing was being cut to meet labor and census, and the DON and administrator stated call lights should be answered within 15 minutes, while the administrator also stated the facility assessment was to be completed annually and the facility lacked a policy for the assessment.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 26, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.