Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0919
D

Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility for Resident with Hemiplegia

Coon Rapids, Minnesota Survey Completed on 06-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when staff failed to consistently ensure that a resident with significant cognitive impairment and right-sided weakness had access to a working call light within reach. The resident's care plan identified cognitive deficits, vascular dementia, cerebral infarction, and hemiplegia affecting the right side, but did not provide specific instructions for staff to place the call light on the resident's unaffected left side. Multiple observations showed the call light was repeatedly placed on the resident's right side, which he was unable to use due to his physical limitations. Interviews with the resident confirmed he could not reach or use the call light when it was placed on his right side, and staff acknowledged the improper placement during the survey. The care plan lacked direction for staff to accommodate the resident's self-care deficits by ensuring necessary items, including the call light, were accessible on his functional side. Additionally, the facility did not have a policy available for call light use. The failure to provide the call light within reach limited the resident's ability to communicate needs, as observed and confirmed through staff and resident interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙