Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0561
D

Failure to Honor Resident Choice in Blood Glucose Monitoring Method

Coon Rapids, Minnesota Survey Completed on 06-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor a resident's right to make choices regarding the method of blood glucose monitoring. A resident with a history of diabetes mellitus, neuropathy, aphasia, hemiplegia, cancer, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, arthritis, depression, and cataracts, and who had experienced cognitive decline since admission, was not given the option to continue using a Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) device as previously used. The resident's hospital discharge summary included orders for both traditional Accu-Chek monitoring and CGM supplies, but the facility only implemented Accu-Chek monitoring without consulting the resident or their family about their preference. During interviews, the resident's family expressed concern that the facility did not allow the use of CGM devices and that no choice was offered regarding the monitoring method. Facility staff, including an LPN and the DON, confirmed that CGMs were permitted and used by other residents, and that the expectation was to discuss monitoring preferences with the resident or their representative. However, there was no documentation of such a discussion or a process for CGM use in the facility's policies. Additionally, the facility was unable to provide policies regarding the admission process, order implementation, or resident choice when requested.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙