Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Assess Resident for Safe Use of Electric Recliner

Waite Park, Minnesota Survey Completed on 08-01-2025

Penalty

3 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to comprehensively assess a resident with moderate cognitive impairment and multiple medical diagnoses, including dementia, anxiety, and limited mobility, for safe use of an electric recliner. The resident's care plan indicated the use of a recliner to elevate her legs and identified her as a fall risk requiring assistance for bed mobility and transfers. However, the physical device assessment did not include the electric recliner, and there was no documentation that the resident's ability to safely use the recliner had been evaluated. Observations showed the resident using the electric recliner independently, with the remote consistently within reach. During one incident, staff had to intervene when the resident elevated the recliner to a point where she nearly slid to the floor. Interviews with staff revealed inconsistent understanding of the resident's ability to operate the recliner remote, with some stating she could use it and others noting confusion and fidgeting. Nursing leadership confirmed the recliner should have been assessed as part of the physical device assessment and acknowledged this was not done. The facility was unable to provide policies related to assistive device and physical device assessments.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙