Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0604
D

Failure to Properly Assess and Document Use of Parameter Mattress as Restraint

Waite Park, Minnesota Survey Completed on 08-01-2025

Penalty

3 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a parameter mattress, which is a type of mattress cover designed to create a gentle barrier around the edge of the bed, was not used in a manner that restrained a resident while in bed. The resident in question had moderate cognitive impairment, required assistance with all activities of daily living, and had multiple diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, and limited mobility. The resident's care plan indicated the use of a lipped mattress to decrease fall risk, but did not document the use of the parameter mattress as a restraint. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) and physical device assessment did not indicate the use of restraints or the parameter mattress for this resident. During observations and interviews, staff confirmed that the resident had a parameter mattress in place for several years to prevent falls, despite the resident being non-ambulatory and unable to get out of bed independently for approximately a year. The parameter mattress was not assessed or documented in the physical device assessment as required, and staff were unsure why it remained in use. The facility's policy defined physical restraints as any device that restricts freedom of movement and specified that such restraints should only be used for medical symptoms and not for staff convenience or fall prevention. The use of the parameter mattress in this case was not supported by assessment or documentation, leading to the deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙