Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Provide Timely Toileting Assistance Resulting in Loss of Dignity

Saint Cloud, Minnesota Survey Completed on 05-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A cognitively intact resident who was dependent on staff for all toileting needs experienced delays in staff response to call lights, resulting in episodes of incontinence and a loss of dignity. The resident reported that on multiple occasions, staff failed to respond in a timely manner to requests for toileting assistance, with some wait times exceeding 20 minutes and one instance reportedly lasting over two hours. On one occasion, after staff turned off the call light and stated they would return but did not, the resident's adult son had to assist with toileting, which the resident described as embarrassing and distressing. Call light logs confirmed that while some calls were answered promptly, there was at least one instance where the response time was over 29 minutes. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that all staff are expected to answer call lights and that delays can occur during busy times, but emphasized the importance of timely assistance to maintain resident dignity. The facility was unable to provide a policy regarding dignity when requested.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙