Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0825
D

Failure to Provide Ordered Rehabilitative Services

Minneapolis, Minnesota Survey Completed on 09-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with central spinal cord syndrome and a history of receiving physical, occupational, and speech therapy did not receive specialized rehabilitative services as ordered. The resident's care plan was updated to include passive range of motion (PROM) and instructions to follow physical therapy (PT) orders. During a care conference, the resident and family requested additional PT due to observed movement in the resident's lower extremities. A provider subsequently ordered a PT evaluation, but the evaluation was not completed after the order was written. Interviews with staff revealed that the PT order was not acted upon, with the LPN confirming that the order "fell through the cracks." The director of nursing stated that the expectation was for therapy to evaluate residents within 72 hours of a new order and to communicate the therapy plan to nursing staff within one week. Despite these expectations, the resident was not evaluated by PT after the new order, and the facility was unable to provide a policy for therapy services when requested.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙