Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Follow Grievance Policy After Resident Reports Peer Antagonism

Aitkin, Minnesota Survey Completed on 04-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow its grievance policy and procedures when a resident voiced concerns about the treatment received from another resident. One resident, who was cognitively intact and able to express his needs, reported being antagonized and taunted by another resident with moderate cognitive impairment and a history of verbal behaviors directed toward others. The concerned resident reported these issues to both the social service designee (SSD) and a registered nurse, but no grievance was filed on his behalf, and he did not receive any documented resolution or follow-up. Staff interviews confirmed that the antagonistic behavior was known among staff, with the SSD acknowledging that the resident had voiced concerns and that the issue had been discussed with the interdisciplinary team. However, the SSD did not document the conversations or initiate a grievance form, and the assistant administrator confirmed that a grievance should have been filed for any resident concern. The facility's policy required prompt investigation and written resolution of grievances, but these steps were not taken in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙