Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0561
D

Failure to Honor Resident's Incontinence Brief Size Preference

Sterling Heights, Michigan Survey Completed on 08-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to honor a resident's preference for incontinence brief size, despite repeated requests and clear evidence that the provided briefs were too small and uncomfortable. The resident, who had diagnoses of Schizoaffective Disorder and Alzheimer's but was cognitively intact, reported that the briefs did not cover the thigh or buttocks area, were too tight, and caused discomfort. The resident stated they had informed staff about the issue, but was told that the current size was all that was available. Observations confirmed that the briefs were stretched thin and did not fit properly, and the resident continued to be placed in briefs that were too small over several days. Further review of the facility's supply showed that larger briefs were available in the storage room, but the correct size was not provided to the resident. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the existence of bariatric briefs for larger residents and noted that shipments had been delayed, but staff had purchased appropriate sizes as needed. The resident's care plan documented the need for assistance with incontinence care, and the facility's admission contract guaranteed reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences. Despite this, the resident's preference for a larger brief was not honored, resulting in discomfort and inadequate care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙