Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Implement Communication Care Plan for Non-English Speaking Resident

Watertown, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 05-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement an effective communication care plan for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and limited English proficiency. The resident, who speaks Haitian-Creole and has diagnoses including dysphagia, dementia, diabetes mellitus, and mild cognitive impairment, was observed during multiple meal times where staff did not attempt to communicate in the resident's preferred language. Staff members spoke only in English, did not use communication boards, and did not utilize interpreter services or language lines, despite the facility's policy requiring meaningful access for individuals with limited English proficiency. Care plans and the Kardex indicated that staff should use simple questions and face-to-face communication, and the facility's policy emphasized the need for language access. However, during observations, staff did not follow these interventions, and interviews revealed a lack of awareness or use of communication aids. The Director of Nursing confirmed the expectation that staff communicate in the resident's preferred language, but this was not observed in practice.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙