Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Follow Care Plan Interventions for Resident Refusing Care

Chelsea, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 07-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Staff failed to consistently implement care plan interventions for a resident with a history of combativeness and resistance to care. The resident, who had significant cognitive impairment, dementia, and diabetes, was care planned to allow refusal of care, with instructions for staff to maintain safety and reapproach at a later time if care was refused. On one occasion, despite the resident verbally refusing foot care and displaying combative behavior, staff continued with the care instead of following the intervention to reapproach later. The care plan also indicated that staff should not force care and should notify the provider if the resident refused. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the charge nurse was aware of the resident's refusal and the care plan interventions but proceeded with the care due to the presence of the podiatrist and time constraints. The assistant director of nursing acknowledged that the charge nurse should not have forced the resident to accept treatment and should have sought assistance from leadership for alternative care. The failure to follow the established care plan interventions resulted in the deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙