Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Develop and Implement Comprehensive, Resident-Centered Care Plans

Hagerstown, Maryland Survey Completed on 05-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, resident-centered care plans for two residents, as identified during a recertification survey. For one resident with significant cognitive impairment and limited mobility, the care plan did not specify the individual's preferred independent activities, nor did it address important preferences such as pet visits and going outside for fresh air, despite these being documented as very important in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Additionally, the care plan for pressure ulcer prevention referenced the use of a bariatric air mattress and required checks for placement and function every shift, but there was no current physician order for the mattress, and documentation of these checks was missing after a certain date. The air mattress was also found to be set incorrectly, and staff were unclear about the correct settings and responsibilities for monitoring the equipment. For another resident, the activity care plan was not individualized to include the resident's preferences for going outside and participating in religious services, as indicated in the MDS assessment. The care plan only mentioned watching TV as an independent activity, omitting other significant preferences. The activities director confirmed that these preferences were not addressed in the care plan. Additionally, this same resident was admitted with pitting edema in both legs, and ongoing provider notes documented continued edema. However, the care plan did not address the resident's edema, despite staff and the director of nursing acknowledging the presence of this condition since admission. These omissions demonstrate a lack of comprehensive and individualized care planning based on residents' assessed needs and preferences.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙