Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0582
D

Failure to Issue Required Medicare Beneficiary Protection Notices

Walkersville, Maryland Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide required Beneficiary Protection Notifications to residents who were discharged from Medicare Part A services but continued to reside in the facility for non-skilled care, despite having Medicare benefit days remaining. Specifically, for one resident, although a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was signed and delivered via telephone to the resident's representative, there was no evidence that the NOMNC was subsequently mailed or otherwise delivered as required by facility policy. Additionally, the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN), which should inform the resident or representative about potential financial liability for non-covered services, was not issued. For another resident, the facility's records did not show that either the NOMNC or SNFABN was provided before the end of Medicare Part A services, even though the resident remained in the facility and had not exhausted benefit days. Staff interviews confirmed a lack of awareness regarding the requirement to mail the NOMNC when not hand-delivered and an absence of documentation for both required notices for the second resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙