Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0838
D

Failure to Conduct and Document Comprehensive Facility-Wide Assessment

Catonsville, Maryland Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to conduct and document a comprehensive and accurate facility-wide assessment to determine the resources necessary to care for residents competently during both routine operations and emergencies. During a complaint survey, the facility provided a binder labeled as the facility assessment, but review of its contents revealed significant omissions and outdated information. The facility profile lacked current data, such as the average resident census and accurate staff information, and did not include the average number of staff on nights. Additionally, the profile listed contact information for previous administrators and maintenance directors, indicating it was not up to date. Further review showed that the assessment did not adequately evaluate the resident population's needs, including an analysis of diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive abilities, and overall acuity. The comorbidity report was limited to 50 residents and did not provide a comprehensive assessment of the entire population. The assessment also failed to address the specific care requirements for residents, such as the types of diseases and disabilities present, and did not evaluate the staff competencies necessary to meet these needs. There was no documentation of staff education, training, or health information technology resources relevant to the resident population. The facility assessment was also missing evaluations of the facility's physical resources, such as buildings, vehicles, equipment, and contracted services. There was no evidence of an assessment of ethnic, cultural, or religious factors that could affect care, nor was there documentation of an evaluation of the number of staff required to meet resident needs. The list of contracted providers did not include an evaluation of how these services would meet regulatory, operational, or training requirements. These deficiencies were acknowledged by the Nursing Home Administrator during the survey.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙