Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0700
D

Failure to Assess and Monitor Bed Rail Entrapment Risk

Grantsville, Maryland Survey Completed on 04-11-2025

Penalty

Fine: $13,250
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to properly assess and monitor the risk of entrapment associated with side rail use for two residents. For one resident, repeated observations showed a significant gap between the mattress and the side rail, but the facility's bed rail assessments did not include evaluation for entrapment risk. Interviews with the DON, Environmental Services Director, and Therapy Director revealed confusion over which department was responsible for conducting safety checks, and it was acknowledged that entrapment assessments were not being performed. The facility's policy also did not address the need to assess for entrapment risk or ongoing safety monitoring. For the second resident, side rails were in use per physician order to assist with bed mobility, and the care plan included monitoring for injury or entrapment. However, the facility's bed rail assessments did not include evaluation for entrapment risk. Documentation indicated that the resident was not using the side rails for mobility and that removal would be attempted, but there was no evidence of follow-up or reevaluation after this recommendation. The resident continued to have orders for side rail use, and the facility was unable to provide documentation of ongoing assessment or reevaluation regarding the need for side rails. The facility's policy required completion of a side rail assessment form before use and periodic reassessment, but the assessments conducted did not address entrapment risk. There was also a lack of clear documentation and follow-through when recommendations for removal of side rails were made. These deficiencies were identified through observations, record reviews, and staff interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙