Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility for Dependent Resident

Alexandria, Louisiana Survey Completed on 05-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple medical diagnoses, including Alzheimer's, dementia, and limited mobility, was not provided reasonable accommodation for their needs. The facility's policy and the resident's care plan both required that the call light be placed within the resident's reach to allow communication with staff. However, during multiple observations over two days, the call light was found on the floor next to the resident's bed, out of the resident's reach, while the resident was lying in bed and unable to access it. The resident was non-interviewable and required total care and extensive assistance for bed mobility. Staff confirmed during the survey that the call light was not accessible and acknowledged that it should have been within reach, as per facility policy and the resident's care plan. The repeated failure to ensure the call light was accessible constituted a lack of reasonable accommodation for the resident's needs and preferences.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙