Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0628
D

Failure to Provide Required 30-Day Discharge Notice and Appeal Rights

Bloomfield, Iowa Survey Completed on 06-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide a resident or the resident's representative with a 30-day written notice prior to discharge, as required. The clinical record review showed that the resident, who had diagnoses including heart failure, diabetes, and unsteadiness, required varying levels of assistance with daily activities and had intact cognition. Documentation in the electronic health record indicated that the resident was informed of the last day of therapy and had plans to return home, with subsequent orders for discharge and therapy at a new facility. However, there was no evidence that a formal discharge notice, including required information about appeal rights, was given. The discharge instructions provided to the resident included details about the discharge location, responsible party, primary physicians, pharmacy, and some care instructions. The document was signed by the resident, the MDS Coordinator, and the social worker. Despite this, the instructions did not constitute a 30-day notice and did not include information on the right to appeal the discharge, the process for appealing, or contact information for the state entity responsible for appeals. During an interview, the Administrator confirmed that the only policy related to discharges was the bed hold policy and that the resident's wife was provided with discharge instructions, but no other form was given. The facility's bed hold and return policy was reviewed, but it did not address the requirements for discharge notice or appeal rights. The lack of proper notice and appeal information constituted the deficiency identified during the survey.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙