Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0694
D

Improper PICC Line Dressing Prevents Site Assessment

Plainfield, Indiana Survey Completed on 05-23-2025

Penalty

Fine: $51,660
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure proper dressing of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line for one resident. On observation, the resident's PICC line was covered with a clear tegaderm dressing and a 2 by 2 split gauze placed directly over the catheter and insertion site, which prevented assessment of the skin around the insertion site. The dressing was dated and initialed, but the facility's own procedure guide specifies that the insertion site should not be covered by anything other than the transparent dressing, and the site must remain visible for assessment. The improper application of the split gauze under the transparent dressing directly contradicted facility policy and prevented visual inspection of the insertion site.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙