Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0561
D

Failure to Honor Resident's Shower Preferences

Williamsport, Indiana Survey Completed on 06-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with moderate cognitive impairment expressed a preference to shower every day and to have showers in the morning, which was documented during an interview and in her admission assessment. The resident's preferences were also recorded in a customary routines and activities observation, indicating it was very important for her to choose the type of bath and that she preferred to be bathed more than twice per week in the morning. Despite this, the resident was scheduled for showers only twice weekly on the evening shift, contrary to her stated preferences. Shower reports showed that the resident was offered showers on various dates, with several refusals, but there was no documentation that her preferences were reassessed or that the timing of the showers matched her morning preference. Progress notes did not indicate that the resident was offered a shower daily or that her preferences were revisited after refusals. The care plan did note her preference for daily showers, but this was not reflected in the actual shower schedule or in follow-up actions. Interviews with facility staff, including the DNS, confirmed that the resident's preferences should have been communicated and implemented, but this did not occur. The facility's policy required that resident preferences be identified and shared with the interdisciplinary team, but there was no evidence this process was followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙