Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0692
D

Failure to Follow Dietitian Recommendations and Notify Physician for Significant Weight Loss

Muncie, Indiana Survey Completed on 06-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow the registered dietitian's (RD) recommendations and did not notify the physician regarding a resident who experienced a significant, unplanned weight loss. The resident, who had diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, muscle weakness, obesity, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, was on a consistent carbohydrate diet. Over a six-month period, the resident lost 10.29% of her body weight, with meal consumption records indicating she typically ate only 51-75% of her meals. Despite the RD's repeated recommendations in March and April to liberalize the resident's diet to a regular diet to provide more calories and protein, the resident continued to receive the carbohydrate controlled diet. The clinical record did not contain documentation that the physician was notified of the significant weight loss or the RD's recommendations, nor was there an order to change the resident's diet or any indication that the physician declined the recommendation. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the RD communicated her recommendations to the interdisciplinary team (IDT) via email and documented them in the electronic medical record, but the DON was unaware that the resident's diet had not been changed. The facility's policy required a multidisciplinary approach to nutritional assessment and intervention, but this process was not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙