Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0745
D

Failure to Assess Consent and Develop Care Plans for Resident Relationships

New Castle, Indiana Survey Completed on 08-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to assess and document the ability of two residents to consent to a resident-to-resident relationship and did not establish individualized, resident-centered care plans addressing their relationship. Resident B, who had a history of stroke and behavioral disturbances and was assessed as having moderate cognitive impairment, reported being in a relationship with Resident C, which included holding hands, playing cards, and kissing. However, there was no documentation in Resident B's clinical record regarding an assessment of her ability to consent to this relationship or a care plan addressing her sexuality and relationship with Resident C. Similarly, Resident C, who had diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and depression and was assessed as cognitively intact, also reported being in a relationship with Resident B, which involved spending time together and kissing. The clinical record for Resident C also lacked documentation of an assessment of his ability to consent and a care plan for his sexuality and relationship with Resident B. The Executive Director confirmed that there was no documentation of capacity to consent or care plans for either resident, despite facility policy requiring such assessments and documentation.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙