Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Catheter Care

Mishawaka, Indiana Survey Completed on 05-27-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the Unit Manager (UM) failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) while providing care to a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter. During an observed care activity, the UM wore gloves but did not don a gown as required by the facility's EBP policy, despite a visible EBP sign and available PPE supplies outside the resident's room. The resident had multiple diagnoses, including neurogenic bladder and an indwelling catheter, and a current physician's order specified the need for both gown and gloves during high-contact care. The UM later acknowledged not wearing a gown during the procedure, which was inconsistent with the facility's policy for residents with indwelling medical devices.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙