Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Residents with Serious Mental Illness

Twin Falls, Idaho Survey Completed on 06-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the status of two residents. For one resident with diagnoses including PTSD, major depressive disorder, and anxiety, the PASRR Level II assessment documented a serious mental illness, but the admission and quarterly MDS assessments did not indicate this diagnosis under the relevant sections. Specifically, the MDS did not reflect the PTSD diagnosis and incorrectly marked that the resident was not considered to have a serious mental illness by the PASRR process. For another resident with major depressive disorder and orthopedic conditions, the admission MDS assessment also failed to indicate that the resident was considered by the PASRR Level II process to have a serious mental illness. These inaccuracies were confirmed during staff interviews, where it was acknowledged that the MDS assessments should have been completed differently to accurately reflect the residents' diagnoses and PASRR determinations.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙