Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate Assessment of Range of Motion in Resident

Honolulu, Hawaii Survey Completed on 04-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately assess a resident for limitations in range of motion. Review of the resident's electronic health record showed discrepancies in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments over several periods. Initially, the MDS indicated no impairment in upper and lower extremities, but subsequent assessments coded impairments on both sides. Interviews with staff revealed that the resident was able to assist with turning on his right side, suggesting that the coding of impairments on both sides may not have been accurate. The MDS coordinator confirmed that, upon review, there was a coding error in the most recent assessment, where impairment should have been recorded on only one side rather than both. This deficiency was identified through record review and staff interviews, which highlighted inconsistencies between the resident's documented functional abilities and the MDS coding. The inaccurate assessment placed the resident at risk of not receiving proper treatment to maintain range of motion, as the documentation did not reflect the resident's actual physical capabilities at the time of the assessment.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙