Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0557
D

Failure to Provide Ordered Urinary Drainage Supplies Resulting in Loss of Dignity

Atlanta, Georgia Survey Completed on 07-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to maintain the dignity of a resident who was admitted with diagnoses including cerebral infarction with left-sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and chronic kidney disease stage three. The resident was cognitively intact, dependent on staff for all activities of daily living, and had a physician's order for a condom catheter with a drainage bag. Despite this order, the facility did not have any large urinary drainage bags available, only leg bags, which were not suitable for the resident's needs. As a result, the resident was placed in an adult incontinence brief instead of the ordered urinary drainage system. The resident expressed dissatisfaction with wearing the adult incontinence brief, stating it caused discomfort and concern for skin breakdown, and made him feel undignified. Staff interviews confirmed that there was a shortage of appropriate urinary drainage bags, and the central supplier acknowledged being recently made aware of the issue. Observations confirmed the resident was wearing an adult incontinence brief due to the lack of proper supplies, and staff were uncertain about when the correct drainage bags would be available.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙