Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Weight Documentation for Multiple Residents

Vero Beach, Florida Survey Completed on 07-09-2025

Penalty

Fine: $35,265
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three out of five sampled residents in relation to their nutritional status, specifically regarding the documentation of resident weights. According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) guidelines, the most recent weight within 30 days of the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) should be used for MDS entries. In the case of one resident with multiple diagnoses including malnutrition and dementia, the MDS recorded a weight from a week prior to the ARD, despite a more recent weight being available on the ARD itself. The MDS Coordinator confirmed that the incorrect, earlier weight was entered instead of the most current one. For two other residents, the MDS assessments documented weights that were not obtained within the required 30-day window prior to the ARD. In one instance, the weight entered was from 41 days before the ARD, and there were no documented weights within the appropriate timeframe. The correct procedure, as outlined in the RAI manual, would have been to use the standard code for no information and document the rationale in the medical record. In the third case, the weight recorded in the MDS was from several months prior to the ARD, again not meeting the 30-day requirement. These findings were confirmed through interviews with the MDS Coordinator, who acknowledged the discrepancies.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙