Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0561
D

Failure to Support Resident's Choice to Transfer

Lake Placid, Florida Survey Completed on 07-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to honor a resident's right to self-determination by not supporting her expressed choice to transfer to another facility. The resident, who had a history of protein-calorie malnutrition, bipolar disorder, mood disorder, opioid dependence, and generalized anxiety disorder, communicated her desire to move to another facility but reported that her requests were ignored and not acted upon. The resident had a moderate cognitive impairment, as indicated by a BIMS score of 10 out of 15. There was no documentation in her progress notes or the facility's grievance log regarding her request or any follow-up actions taken by staff. Interviews with the Social Services Assistant revealed that although she was aware of the resident's wish to transfer and had discussed it with her, she did not document the conversation or any change in the resident's wishes. The facility's policy requires informing residents of their rights and documenting relevant information, but there was no evidence that the resident's request or subsequent discussions were recorded. This lack of documentation and follow-up resulted in the facility failing to promote and facilitate the resident's right to make choices about her care and living arrangements.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙