Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Revise Care Plan for Comfort Measures Only

Bethel, Connecticut Survey Completed on 07-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plan for a resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, and chronic pain was reviewed and revised to include interventions related to comfort measures only. After the resident was placed on hospice care due to heart failure and chronic pain, hospice care was later discontinued, and a physician's order directed comfort measures only. However, a review of the clinical record did not identify a care plan with interventions specific to comfort measures. The resident was aware of the comfort measures order but was not sure what specific treatments were in place to maintain comfort. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the MDS director was responsible for reviewing and revising care plans according to the resident's assessment schedule, and the social worker was responsible for care plans related to hospice and comfort measures. The MDS director acknowledged that a terminal diagnosis care plan should have been added and amended to reflect the comfort measures order, but this was not done. Facility policy required that care plans be reviewed and revised following significant changes in status and kept current by all disciplines, but this process was not followed for the resident in question.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙