Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Develop and Implement Comprehensive Care Plans for Fall Risk and ADL Assistance

Waterbury, Connecticut Survey Completed on 04-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for two residents, resulting in deficiencies related to fall risk management and adherence to required assistance for activities of daily living. One resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cervical radiculopathy, and congestive heart failure had a history of falls and was identified as having impairments in strength and mobility. Despite a fall and subsequent risk assessment indicating the resident was at risk for falls, the care plan did not reflect this risk or include appropriate interventions until after another fall occurred. Documentation revealed that the fall risk care plan had previously been marked as resolved without clear justification, and staff responsible for care planning were unaware of the absence of an active fall risk plan prior to the incident. Another resident with adjustment disorder, anxiety, and psychotic disorder was care planned to require two staff members for all direct care due to behavioral concerns. Observations showed that this intervention was not consistently followed, with nurse aides providing care alone on multiple occasions. Interviews with staff indicated a lack of awareness regarding the continued need for two-person assistance, and staffing patterns made it difficult to comply with the care plan directive. The care card for the resident continued to specify the need for two staff members, but this was not adhered to in practice. Facility policy required the development and ongoing updating of individualized care plans, with staff expected to follow the most current plan of care. In both cases, the facility did not ensure that care plans accurately reflected residents' needs or that staff consistently implemented the specified interventions, leading to deficiencies in resident care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙