Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0644
D

Failure to Refer New Mental Health Diagnosis for Level II Evaluation

Danbury, Connecticut Survey Completed on 05-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to refer a newly identified mental health diagnosis to the appropriate state-designated mental health authority for a Level II evaluation, as required by policy. The clinical record review for one resident revealed that although a previous Level II evaluation had been completed for a diagnosis of delusional disorder, a new diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder was identified several months later without evidence of a subsequent referral for reassessment. The facility's policy mandates prompt notification to the state mental health authority after a significant change in mental or physical condition for residents with mental disorders. The resident involved had a history of schizoaffective disorder, mild cognitive impairment, and delusional disorder, and was assessed as severely cognitively impaired but independent in certain activities of daily living. The care plan noted ongoing psychosocial distress and the use of antipsychotic medication, with interventions including evaluation for psychiatric or behavioral health consults. During interviews, the social worker indicated she was unaware that a new referral was required for a new mental health diagnosis in a long-term care resident with a prior Level II evaluation, leading to the failure to initiate the necessary referral process.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙