Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0628
D

Failure to Provide Written Discharge Notice and Appeal Rights

West Hartford, Connecticut Survey Completed on 08-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide written notice of discharge and did not inform a resident of their right to appeal prior to discharge. The resident, who had diagnoses including anxiety, heart failure, and dysphagia, was cognitively intact and required varying levels of assistance with activities of daily living. The resident went on a leave of absence (LOA) with a responsible party, with the expectation to return on a specified date. Documentation showed that the resident and responsible party communicated changes in the return date, but there was no indication that the resident expressed a desire to be discharged or that a medical provider was involved in the discharge decision. When the resident did not return at the agreed-upon time, facility staff informed the responsible party that the resident was considered discharged against medical advice (AMA) for violating LOA protocol. There was no evidence that a written discharge notice was provided or that the resident was informed of their right to appeal the discharge. Interviews with the responsible party and social worker confirmed that neither written notification nor information about appeal rights was given prior to the discharge, and the facility's documentation did not reflect involvement of a medical provider in the discharge process.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙