Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Revise Care Plan for Resident with Escalating Combative Behaviors

Danbury, Connecticut Survey Completed on 05-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that appropriate interventions, including enhanced monitoring, were implemented for a resident with a documented history of combative behavior towards staff. The resident, who had diagnoses of dementia and a history of traumatic brain injury, exhibited ongoing combative and aggressive behaviors as documented in multiple psychiatric consults and staff reports. Despite these documented behaviors, the care plan did not include specific interventions to address the resident's aggression towards staff, and there was no evidence that the care plan was revised in response to the escalating behaviors. The care plan only addressed wandering and intrusiveness, with interventions such as encouraging diversional activities and walking with staff, but did not address the resident's combative actions. The deficiency was further evidenced when the resident became the aggressor in a physical altercation with another resident, resulting in the need for 1:1 enhanced monitoring only after the incident occurred. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of awareness and communication regarding the resident's combative behaviors, and there was no policy provided for care plan revisions based on changes in condition. The facility's policy required the interdisciplinary team to document and adjust interventions based on behavioral changes, but this was not followed in the case of this resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙