Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Secure Front Entrance Resulting in Unsupervised Resident Exit

Waterford, Connecticut Survey Completed on 06-30-2025

Penalty

Fine: $44,830
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident with diagnoses of dementia, depression, and convulsions, who had a physician's order to leave the facility only with a responsible party and required supervision for transfers and ambulation, was able to exit the facility unattended. The resident was last seen in the dining room and was later found off facility grounds in a nearby parking lot. The resident was able to ambulate independently but required assistance due to fall risk and impaired cognition, as documented in the care plan and confirmed by therapy staff. The investigation revealed that the front entrance door, which was supposed to be locked when the receptionist was not present, was found unlocked on the morning of the incident. Staff interviews indicated that the door was sometimes left unlocked for convenience, allowing staff and housekeepers to enter, and that there was not always someone monitoring the front desk. The receptionist, who arrived after the resident had already left, confirmed the door was unlocked upon arrival and had seen someone matching the resident's description walking outside. Facility policy required that residents not be unsupervised outside the facility, and staff were expected to monitor the front entrance. However, inconsistent practices regarding the locking and monitoring of the front door allowed the resident to leave the building without staff knowledge or supervision, contrary to the resident's care plan and physician's orders.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙