Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0700
D

Failure to Obtain Informed Consent for Bedside Rail Use

South Gate, California Survey Completed on 07-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow its own policy and procedure regarding the use of bedside rails for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and total dependence on staff for activities of daily living. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, and hypertension. The physician ordered bilateral side rails for turning, repositioning, and injury prevention, and the care plan required that the risks and benefits of side rail use be explained to the resident or their representative, with informed consent obtained prior to use. However, observations confirmed that the resident was using bilateral side rails, and interviews with the resident's representative revealed that no explanation of risks or benefits was provided, nor was informed consent obtained or documented. A review of the resident's clinical records confirmed the absence of a completed or signed informed consent for side rail use. The facility's policies, revised in 2024 and 2025, clearly required assessment, education, and documented consent before applying side rails. Staff interviews further confirmed that the required discussion and documentation did not occur, resulting in the resident and their representative not being given the opportunity to make an informed decision regarding the use of side rails.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙