Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Prevent Elopement and Ensure Supervision for Cognitively Impaired Resident

Daly City, California Survey Completed on 06-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards and did not ensure adequate supervision for a resident who was at risk for elopement. The resident, who had a history of traumatic brain injury, confusion, memory problems, impaired cognition, and lower leg impairment, did not speak or understand English and was not always understandable in her primary language. Despite these risk factors, the resident eloped from the facility twice during the night shift, each time wearing only a nightgown and without appropriate outerwear. On both occasions, the resident was found outside the facility, once in an apartment building and once near a shopping mall underpass, and was confused when found. Police were notified, and the resident was taken to a hospital after the second incident. Staff interviews and record reviews revealed that the Wanderguard alarm, intended to prevent elopement, was not checked for functionality, and staff were not properly oriented or trained in its use. The LVN assigned to the resident on the night of the first elopement stated they had never checked the Wanderguard alarm and had not received orientation. The facility's policy required evaluation for wandering risk, implementation of interventions, and regular checks of monitoring systems, but these procedures were not followed. The ADON could not explain how the resident exited the facility undetected, and there was a lack of consistent supervision at the front desk during the night shift.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙