Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0805
D

Noncompliance with Puree Diet Order for Resident with Dysphagia

Riverside, California Survey Completed on 06-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with a diagnosis of dysphagia and a physician-ordered fortified puree diet with nectar/mildly thick liquids was given cotton candy by the Business Office Manager. The resident's care plan and dietary profile both specified the need for a puree texture diet due to swallowing difficulties, and the goal was to ensure safe consumption of food without signs of aspiration. Despite these orders, the Business Office Manager provided the resident with cotton candy after previously asking the former DON if it was permissible. The Registered Dietitian confirmed that the resident should not have been given cotton candy, and the Assistant Director of Nursing stated that staff should communicate with nursing before providing any treats or snacks to residents on special diets. The incident was observed by an LVN, who noted the resident consuming cotton candy and confirmed the resident was at high risk for aspiration. The facility's policy on therapeutic diets required that snacks be compatible with the prescribed diet. The failure to adhere to the prescribed puree diet and provide food in the appropriate form as ordered by the physician resulted in a deficiency, as it placed the resident at risk for choking or aspiration.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙