Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0693
D

Failure to Administer Correct Enteral Tube Feeding Rate

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 06-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide the correct enteral tube feeding rate for one resident who had a gastrostomy and was dependent on tube feeding due to multiple diagnoses, including encephalopathy, dysphagia, seizures, aspiration pneumonia, and dementia. The resident was ordered by the physician to receive enteral tube feeding at a rate of 65 mL per hour. However, during observation, the tube feeding machine was found to be set at 45 mL per hour, contrary to the physician's order and the label on the feeding tube. Staff initially stated the label was incorrect, but upon review of the order, it was confirmed that the machine should have been set to 65 mL per hour. The resident's medical records indicated a history of gradual weight loss and a recent five-pound loss, with the dietician noting the need for increased calories and protein from tube feeding. The facility's policy required staff to check the enteral nutrition label against the physician's order before administration, including verifying the rate of administration. Despite this policy, the error in the feeding rate was not identified until observed by surveyors, and both the RN and DON acknowledged that the incorrect rate could place the resident at risk for malnutrition and skin breakdown.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙