Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility for Dependent Resident

Covina, California Survey Completed on 05-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident with hemiplegia affecting the right dominant side, muscle weakness, and anxiety was found with their call light on the floor and out of reach. The resident's care plan specified that the call light should be kept within reach, particularly on the side of the resident's strong arm and hand. During observation, the resident was lying in bed with a contracted right hand, and the call light was not accessible. Certified Nurse Assistant 3 confirmed that the resident could not reach the call light and acknowledged it should have been placed within reach of the resident's functional side. Further review of the resident's records indicated that the resident was dependent on staff for activities of daily living and had intact cognition. The facility's policy and procedures required that call lights be kept within reach of residents at all times. The Director of Nursing also stated that the call light should be placed close to the resident's good arm and hand to ensure timely response to needs. The failure to keep the call light within reach was contrary to both the care plan and facility policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙