Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
B

Failure to Follow Up on Physician-Ordered Urology Consultation

Anaheim, California Survey Completed on 07-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide necessary care and services for one resident by not following up on a physician-ordered urology consultation. The resident, who had a suprapubic urinary catheter, had a physician's order for a urology consult to address the catheter change. Documentation showed that the Case Manager initially contacted an outside facility to confirm eligibility for the consultation and was instructed to call back if no response was received by a specified time. However, there was no evidence that the Case Manager followed up as directed. Interviews with facility staff, including the LVN, Social Services Designee (SSD), and Case Manager, confirmed that the process for arranging outside consultations involves communication between licensed nurses, the SSD, and the Case Manager. All parties verified that the follow-up call to schedule the urology consult was not made, as required by the physician's order and facility policy. This lapse resulted in the resident not receiving the ordered consultation in a timely manner.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙