Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0847
E

Failure to Properly Complete and Explain Arbitration Agreements

Torrance, California Survey Completed on 08-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that arbitration agreements were accurately completed and that residents or their representatives were properly informed of their rights regarding these agreements. Specifically, three residents were affected: one resident with intact cognition had an incomplete arbitration agreement lacking a facility staff signature, while two other residents with moderate to severe cognitive impairment had incomplete arbitration agreements with missing resident or representative signatures. The facility did not assess the mental capacity of these residents or provide them with adequate information before presenting the arbitration agreements for signature. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that residents with impaired cognition should not have been asked to sign arbitration agreements, and that the agreements for all three residents were incomplete and therefore invalid. The facility's policy required that arbitration agreements be explained in a manner understandable to the resident or their representative, and that the resident acknowledge understanding of the agreement. These requirements were not met for the sampled residents, as evidenced by incomplete documentation and lack of proper assessment of decision-making capacity.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙