Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Incomplete and Inaccurate POLST Documentation for Multiple Residents

Huntington Beach, California Survey Completed on 06-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that medical records, specifically the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms, were accurate and complete for three of eight sampled residents. For one resident with dementia and moderate cognitive impairment, the POLST form was missing the physician's phone number, license number, signature, and the responsible party's signature, address, and telephone number. The responsible party's signature was entered by a nurse without indicating it was a verbal consent, and the nurse practitioner’s name was incorrectly entered in the section for the supervising physician. These omissions were verified during a medical record review with a registered nurse. For another resident with moderate cognitive impairment, the POLST form lacked the nurse practitioner's phone number, license number, date signed, and the supervising physician's name. The form also did not indicate whether the information was discussed with the resident, and the resident's address, telephone number, and signature date were missing. A third resident, who was cognitively intact, had a POLST form that did not document a second nurse witnessing the verbal consent from the responsible party, omitted the resident's wishes regarding artificially administered nutrition, and left the responsible party's address and phone number blank. These findings were confirmed by both a registered nurse and the Director of Nursing.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙