Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0803
D

Failure to Honor Resident's Cultural Food Preferences

San Pedro, California Survey Completed on 05-09-2025

Penalty

1 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident's food preferences, including cultural preferences, were identified and honored. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, muscle weakness, and dementia, had a severe cognitive impairment and was unable to express his preferences verbally. The resident primarily spoke Japanese and had limited English proficiency, and no staff at the facility spoke Japanese. Despite this, the dietary staff supervisor only interviewed the resident, who was unable to communicate effectively, and did not consult the resident's family or representative to determine food likes, dislikes, or cultural preferences. The care plan indicated a goal to include the resident's food preferences in his therapeutic diet, but this was not achieved. Interviews with staff confirmed that the resident never received Japanese food and that the dietary staff supervisor was unaware of the resident's language or cultural background. The supervisor acknowledged that, given the resident's severe cognitive impairment, the family should have been interviewed to obtain this information. The facility's policy required the dietary service supervisor to participate in food preference updates and resident visits, but these steps were not followed. As a result, the resident did not receive food items consistent with his cultural preferences and choices.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙