Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0806
D

Failure to Honor Resident Dietary Preferences

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 07-26-2025

Penalty

40 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor a resident's documented dietary preferences by providing food items that were specifically listed as dislikes on the resident's meal ticket. The resident, who had diagnoses including heart failure and muscle weakness and required assistance with food setup, received a lunch meal consisting of corn, mashed potatoes, and meat with gravy, despite mashed potatoes and gravy being listed as disliked foods. The resident also reported inconsistencies in receiving preferred meal options, such as receiving an omelet instead of scrambled eggs and incomplete toppings for chef's salads. The dietary supervisor confirmed that resident preferences are available to the kitchen through their diet system and acknowledged that receiving disliked foods could result in the resident being upset and not eating. The facility's policy requires that food provided accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, but this was not followed in the case of this resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙