Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Provide Timely Urology Consultation as Ordered

Cupertino, California Survey Completed on 06-03-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and urinary retention did not receive a urology consultation as ordered by the physician. The resident was admitted with an indwelling urinary catheter, and physician orders and progress notes repeatedly documented the need for a urology referral and evaluation. Despite these orders, the resident was not seen by a urologist during their stay, and the referral remained pending throughout their admission. Interviews with facility staff, including the DON and Nurse Supervisor, confirmed that the urology consult was ordered but not completed, with the Nurse Supervisor stating that referrals typically take a month or more to process. The resident ultimately was discharged against medical advice without having received the required urology evaluation. Facility policy indicated that the Director of Social Services, with assistance from nursing staff, was responsible for arranging such referrals, but this process was not completed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙