Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Honor Resident's Rights to Visitor Choice and Responsible Party

Temple City, California Survey Completed on 06-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor a resident's right to receive visitors of her choice and to designate her own responsible party. The resident, who had diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease, and required dialysis, was cognitively intact and capable of making her own decisions. Despite multiple documented requests from the resident to restrict visits from certain individuals and to change her responsible party to another person, these requests were not acted upon by facility staff. Documentation in the resident's records, including social services notes and interdisciplinary team notes, showed that the resident repeatedly expressed her desire not to have visits from specific visitors and to have a different responsible party involved in her care. The resident also communicated her wishes directly to staff members, including certified nursing assistants and social services staff, and requested that her medical records be updated to reflect these changes. However, the facility did not update the records or enforce the resident's preferences, resulting in unwanted visits and continued involvement of the previously designated responsible party. During interviews and observations, the resident stated she felt unsafe and uncomfortable due to the facility's failure to respect her choices regarding visitors and responsible party. Staff confirmed that the resident had the capacity to make these decisions and that her requests should have been honored. The facility's own policy required staff to respect residents' rights to self-determination and to document personal preferences, but these procedures were not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙