Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Inaccurate Documentation of Bed Rail Use and Consent

Pomona, California Survey Completed on 05-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure accurate and consistent documentation regarding the use of bed side rails for one resident. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia, hypertension, and dysphagia, and was assessed as having severe cognitive impairment and being dependent in activities of daily living and mobility, was observed with all four quarter rails raised on their bed. However, the side rail assessment documented in the medical record indicated the use of full side rails on two sides, which did not match the actual configuration in use. Additionally, the physician's order specified bilateral half rails times four, while the side rail consent form signed for the resident indicated quarter rails on two sides, further contributing to the inconsistency. Interviews with facility staff, including an LVN and the DON, confirmed that the documentation in the resident's record did not accurately reflect the physician's order or the actual bed rail setup. The discrepancies between the side rail assessment, the physician's order, and the consent form resulted in a lack of clarity regarding the type of side rails to be used and whether the resident's representative had consented to the correct intervention. The facility's policy required that documentation be objective, complete, and accurate, but this was not followed in the case of this resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙