Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0700
D

Failure to Ensure Accurate Assessment, Consent, and Documentation for Bed Rail Use

Pomona, California Survey Completed on 05-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the safe and appropriate use of bed rails for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and total dependence on activities of daily living and mobility. The resident was observed with all four quarter rails raised and locked, but the facility's documentation did not align with the actual bed rail configuration in use. Specifically, the side rail assessment indicated full side rails on two sides, the physician's order called for bilateral half rails times four, and the consent form referenced quarter rails on two sides. None of these documents accurately reflected the four quarter rails that were actually in use for the resident. Additionally, the facility did not obtain informed consent that matched the physician's order or the actual bed rail setup. The consent form signed by the resident's representative described a different rail configuration than what was implemented, and there was no documented evidence that the risks and benefits of using all four quarter side rails were explained to the resident's responsible party. This created a lack of clarity regarding the intervention to which consent was given and whether the resident's representative was fully informed. Interviews with facility staff, including an LVN and the DON, confirmed these inconsistencies and acknowledged that the documentation did not accurately reflect the resident's needs or the actual intervention in place. Facility policies reviewed required that the risks and benefits of side rail use be explained and that documentation be complete and accurate, but these requirements were not met in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙