Failure to Notify Ombudsman of Resident Discharges
Summary
The facility failed to send a copy of the notice of transfer or discharge to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 3 of 3 sampled residents. The deficiency was identified through closed record review, staff interviews, review of facility documentation and policy, and the State Agency complaint tracking system. The report states that the omission affected residents who were discharged from the facility and that the notices were not sent to the Ombudsman as required. Resident #150 was admitted with diagnoses including hypertension and status post recovery from incarcerated/strangulated inguinal hernia repair. Admission documentation indicated the resident could communicate needs and wants effectively, although the 5-day MDS showed a BIMS score of 3.0, indicating severe impairment. Progress notes documented that the resident became unhappy with the food, requested discharge back home, and later left against medical advice with the resident's representative/family wanting the resident to return home. The resident was discharged on March 7, 2025. Resident #142 was readmitted with diagnoses including anxiety, depression, and chronic back pain. The BIMS assessment showed a score of 15.0, indicating cognitive intactness. IDT notes described the resident as bedbound, needing minimum assistance for transfers and contact guard assistance for ADLs, and progress notes showed orders for Gabapentin, methocarbamol, and Morphine Sulfate for pain management. The resident left the facility against medical advice without medication and was picked up by a family member on March 18, 2025. Resident #147 had diagnoses including CAD, heart failure, hypertension, DM, malnutrition, and anxiety disorder, was under hospice care, and had a BIMS score of 7.0. Records showed the resident remained on hospice with ongoing monitoring and care planning, but the resident's POA later requested discharge home, signed the AMA form, and removed the resident from the facility on June 26, 2025. Staff interviews showed inconsistent understanding and performance of the discharge-notification process. The case manager stated that discharge notices should be sent monthly to the Ombudsman, but also stated that notices had not been sent for several months and that she had recently sent June and July discharge notifications. The Ombudsman stated she had received only the November and December 2024 notices and had not received the other notices for the year except the one recently sent. The social service director stated that discharge notices are part of the discharge process and should be sent monthly, while another staff member covering case management stated she did not send the notices for April through June and acknowledged that the facility had not sent notices from January through May 2025. The DON stated that the Ombudsman is notified at the end of the month, but also stated that the case manager was not sending the notices.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 26, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.